Most scientific studies are biased, flawed, and wrong? Even possibly fraudulent? See link. ?

Science in general works well when scientific method and double blind testing is done by the book. Only problem none of the pro AGW research was done this way and so is highly suspect for being fraudulent because it ignores very well doented historical climate extremes and pretends they never happened. Then they base their its disastrous claims that we are destroying the world on increases from the bottom of cool periods instead of the Holocene climate average or mean that we might not even reach during this current climate optimum. To other historians and me this in itself is worthy of them being charged and jailed for criminal fraud.